David Erik Nelson’s terrifying story “In the Sharing Place” is in our September/October issue on sale now. Join him below as he demonstrates how a genre-switch can save a mediocre piece of writing.
Craftspeople, as a class, spend a lot of time annoyed.
Why? Imagine that you love a thing so much that you want to create more of that thing. But creating that thing is hard; it takes skills you don’t have and time you don’t have, pays very little, and opens you up to criticism and abuse from a lot of armchair generals. But you love the thing a lot (and are a great fool), so you invest a lot of energy in honing the skills need to create more of that thing you love. Meanwhile, since you love the thing, you keep seeking the thing out. Noting the immutability of Sturgeon’s Law, it is inevitable that as your skills improve and tastes grow refined—and you keep devouring ever more of the thing—you’re going to hit an ever-increasing number of examples of imperfect executions of that Thing You Love.
Profound, near-constant annoyance is the natural consequence.
You can do two things with that annoyance:
- You can kvetch about it (probably on social media, and almost certainly preaching to your choir)—or
- You can rewrite it the way you would have written it (i.e., the Right Way, Dammit!™)
PRO-TIP: Every working artist I’ve asked about this sits squarely in Group #2. The Phantom Menace alone has spawned at least seven published novels penned by hella annoyed sf/f fans.
Consider this SNL skit—which comes so very, very close to being The Best Twilight Zone Episode Never Written that it just about makes you want to weep with frustration. Take five minutes to watch it now:
This piece could be great—it starts out so solidly!—but ultimately falls flat and is unsatisfying. Why? What went wrong?
What Went Wrong with the Greatest Twilight Zone Episode Never Written
Continue reading “How to Make a Weak Saturday Night Live Skit into a Solid Twilight Zone Episode”